0.07/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.13/0.15	% Command    : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC
0.16/0.37	% Computer   : n011.cluster.edu
0.16/0.37	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.16/0.37	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.16/0.37	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.16/0.37	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.16/0.37	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.16/0.37	% WCLimit    : 120
0.16/0.37	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 14:26:55 EDT 2021
0.16/0.37	% CPUTime    : 
0.16/0.37	% Number of cores: 8
0.16/0.37	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.16/0.38	# Version: 2.6rc1-ho
0.16/0.39	# No SInE strategy applied
0.16/0.39	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
0.23/0.43	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S044I
0.23/0.43	# and selection function SelectMaxLComplexNoXTypePred.
0.23/0.43	#
0.23/0.43	# Preprocessing time       : 0.036 s
0.23/0.43	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.23/0.43	
0.23/0.43	# Proof found!
0.23/0.43	# SZS status Theorem
0.23/0.43	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.23/0.43	thf(hoasinduction_lem3_lthm, axiom, (hoasinduction_lem3_lthm<=>(axvarid=>(axvarshift=>(hoasinduction_lem3aa=>hoasinduction_lem3)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/ALG003^0.ax', hoasinduction_lem3_lthm)).
0.23/0.43	thf(axvarid, axiom, (axvarid<=>![X1:term]:(sub @ X1 @ id)=(X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/ALG003^0.ax', axvarid)).
0.23/0.43	thf(axvarshift, axiom, (axvarshift<=>(push @ one @ sh)=(id)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/ALG003^0.ax', axvarshift)).
0.23/0.43	thf(hoasinduction_lem3aa, axiom, (hoasinduction_lem3aa<=>![X22:subst > term > subst > $o]:(![X12:subst > term > term]:(![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst]:(sub @ (X12 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4)=(X12 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))=>(![X1:term]:(X22 @ id @ X1 @ id=>X22 @ id @ (X12 @ id @ X1) @ id)=>X22 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (^[X3:subst, X1:term]:X12 @ X3 @ X1)) @ id))=>![X1:term]:(![X2:term]:(X22 @ id @ X2 @ id=>X22 @ id @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ X2 @ id)) @ id)=>X22 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/ALG003^0.ax', hoasinduction_lem3aa)).
0.23/0.43	thf(hoasinduction_lem3, axiom, (hoasinduction_lem3<=>![X24:subst > term > subst > $o]:(![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst, X5:subst]:(X24 @ X3 @ X1 @ (comp @ X5 @ X4)=>X24 @ (comp @ X3 @ X5) @ (sub @ X1 @ X5) @ X4)=>(![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst, X5:subst]:(X24 @ (comp @ X3 @ X5) @ (sub @ X1 @ X5) @ X4=>X24 @ X3 @ X1 @ (comp @ X5 @ X4))=>(![X12:subst > term > term]:(![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst]:(sub @ (X12 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4)=(X12 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))=>(![X1:term]:(X24 @ id @ X1 @ id=>X24 @ id @ (X12 @ id @ X1) @ id)=>X24 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (^[X3:subst, X1:term]:X12 @ X3 @ X1)) @ id))=>![X1:term]:(![X2:term]:(X24 @ id @ X2 @ id=>X24 @ id @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ X2 @ id)) @ id)=>X24 @ id @ (lam @ X1) @ id))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/ALG003^0.ax', hoasinduction_lem3)).
0.23/0.43	thf(thm, conjecture, hoasinduction_lem3_lthm, file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', thm)).
0.23/0.43	thf(hoaslam, axiom, (hoaslam)=(^[X3:subst, X12:subst > term > term]:lam @ (X12 @ sh @ one)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/ALG003^0.ax', hoaslam)).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_7, axiom, (hoasinduction_lem3_lthm)=((![X1:term]:(sub @ X1 @ id)=(X1)=>((push @ one @ sh)=(id)=>(![X22:subst > term > subst > $o]:(![X12:subst > term > term]:(![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst]:(sub @ (X12 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4)=(X12 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))=>(![X1:term]:(X22 @ id @ X1 @ id=>X22 @ id @ (X12 @ id @ X1) @ id)=>X22 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (^[X3:subst, X1:term]:X12 @ X3 @ X1)) @ id))=>![X1:term]:(![X2:term]:(X22 @ id @ X2 @ id=>X22 @ id @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ X2 @ id)) @ id)=>X22 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id))=>![X24:subst > term > subst > $o]:(![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst, X5:subst]:(X24 @ X3 @ X1 @ (comp @ X5 @ X4)=>X24 @ (comp @ X3 @ X5) @ (sub @ X1 @ X5) @ X4)=>(![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst, X5:subst]:(X24 @ (comp @ X3 @ X5) @ (sub @ X1 @ X5) @ X4=>X24 @ X3 @ X1 @ (comp @ X5 @ X4))=>(![X12:subst > term > term]:(![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst]:(sub @ (X12 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4)=(X12 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))=>(![X1:term]:(X24 @ id @ X1 @ id=>X24 @ id @ (X12 @ id @ X1) @ id)=>X24 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (^[X3:subst, X1:term]:X12 @ X3 @ X1)) @ id))=>![X1:term]:(![X2:term]:(X24 @ id @ X2 @ id=>X24 @ id @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ X2 @ id)) @ id)=>X24 @ id @ (lam @ X1) @ id)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[hoasinduction_lem3_lthm, axvarid]), axvarshift]), hoasinduction_lem3aa]), hoasinduction_lem3])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X1:term, X3:subst, X12:subst > term > term]:(esk1_3 @ X12 @ X3 @ X1)=(X12 @ X3 @ X1), introduced(definition)).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~((![X1:term]:(sub @ X1 @ id)=(X1)=>((push @ one @ sh)=(id)=>(![X22:subst > term > subst > $o]:(![X12:subst > term > term]:(![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst]:(sub @ (X12 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4)=(X12 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))=>(![X1:term]:(X22 @ id @ X1 @ id=>X22 @ id @ (X12 @ id @ X1) @ id)=>X22 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (esk1_3 @ X12)) @ id))=>![X1:term]:(![X2:term]:(X22 @ id @ X2 @ id=>X22 @ id @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ X2 @ id)) @ id)=>X22 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id))=>![X24:subst > term > subst > $o]:(![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst, X5:subst]:(X24 @ X3 @ X1 @ (comp @ X5 @ X4)=>X24 @ (comp @ X3 @ X5) @ (sub @ X1 @ X5) @ X4)=>(![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst, X5:subst]:(X24 @ (comp @ X3 @ X5) @ (sub @ X1 @ X5) @ X4=>X24 @ X3 @ X1 @ (comp @ X5 @ X4))=>(![X12:subst > term > term]:(![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst]:(sub @ (X12 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4)=(X12 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))=>(![X1:term]:(X24 @ id @ X1 @ id=>X24 @ id @ (X12 @ id @ X1) @ id)=>X24 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (esk1_3 @ X12)) @ id))=>![X1:term]:(![X2:term]:(X24 @ id @ X2 @ id=>X24 @ id @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ X2 @ id)) @ id)=>X24 @ id @ (lam @ X1) @ id)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm]), c_0_7]), c_0_8]), c_0_8])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X3:subst, X12:subst > term > term]:(hoaslam @ X3 @ X12)=(lam @ (X12 @ sh @ one)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[hoaslam])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X335:term, X336:subst > term > subst > $o, X338:subst, X339:term, X340:subst, X341:term, X342:term, X345:subst, X346:term, X347:subst, X348:subst, X349:subst, X350:term, X351:subst, X352:subst, X353:subst > term > term, X359:term]:((sub @ X335 @ id)=(X335)&((push @ one @ sh)=(id)&((((X336 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ X336 @ X342) @ id|X336 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X342 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id|(sub @ (esk2_1 @ X336 @ X338 @ X339) @ X340)=(esk2_1 @ X336 @ (comp @ X338 @ X340) @ (sub @ X339 @ X340)))&(~X336 @ id @ (sub @ X342 @ (push @ (esk3_2 @ X336 @ X342) @ id)) @ id|X336 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X342 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id|(sub @ (esk2_1 @ X336 @ X338 @ X339) @ X340)=(esk2_1 @ X336 @ (comp @ X338 @ X340) @ (sub @ X339 @ X340))))&(((X336 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ X336 @ X342) @ id|X336 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X342 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id|(~X336 @ id @ X341 @ id|X336 @ id @ (esk2_1 @ X336 @ id @ X341) @ id))&(~X336 @ id @ (sub @ X342 @ (push @ (esk3_2 @ X336 @ X342) @ id)) @ id|X336 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X342 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id|(~X336 @ id @ X341 @ id|X336 @ id @ (esk2_1 @ X336 @ id @ X341) @ id)))&((X336 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ X336 @ X342) @ id|X336 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X342 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id|~X336 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (esk1_3 @ (esk2_1 @ X336))) @ id)&(~X336 @ id @ (sub @ X342 @ (push @ (esk3_2 @ X336 @ X342) @ id)) @ id|X336 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X342 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id|~X336 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (esk1_3 @ (esk2_1 @ X336))) @ id))))&((~epred1_0 @ X345 @ X346 @ (comp @ X348 @ X347)|epred1_0 @ (comp @ X345 @ X348) @ (sub @ X346 @ X348) @ X347)&((~epred1_0 @ (comp @ X349 @ X352) @ (sub @ X350 @ X352) @ X351|epred1_0 @ X349 @ X350 @ (comp @ X352 @ X351))&(((epred1_0 @ id @ (esk7_1 @ X353) @ id|epred1_0 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (esk1_3 @ X353)) @ id|(sub @ (X353 @ (esk4_1 @ X353) @ (esk5_1 @ X353)) @ (esk6_1 @ X353))!=(X353 @ (comp @ (esk4_1 @ X353) @ (esk6_1 @ X353)) @ (sub @ (esk5_1 @ X353) @ (esk6_1 @ X353))))&(~epred1_0 @ id @ (X353 @ id @ (esk7_1 @ X353)) @ id|epred1_0 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (esk1_3 @ X353)) @ id|(sub @ (X353 @ (esk4_1 @ X353) @ (esk5_1 @ X353)) @ (esk6_1 @ X353))!=(X353 @ (comp @ (esk4_1 @ X353) @ (esk6_1 @ X353)) @ (sub @ (esk5_1 @ X353) @ (esk6_1 @ X353)))))&((~epred1_0 @ id @ X359 @ id|epred1_0 @ id @ (sub @ esk8_0 @ (push @ X359 @ id)) @ id)&~epred1_0 @ id @ (lam @ esk8_0) @ id))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X333:subst, X334:subst > term > term]:(hoaslam @ X333 @ X334)=(lam @ (X334 @ sh @ one)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X360:term, X361:subst, X362:subst > term > term]:(esk1_3 @ X362 @ X361 @ X360)=(X362 @ X361 @ X360), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X3:subst, X2:term, X14:subst > term > subst > $o, X4:subst, X1:term]:(X14 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id|(sub @ (esk2_1 @ X14 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)=(esk2_1 @ X14 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X2 @ X4))|~X14 @ id @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ (esk3_2 @ X14 @ X1) @ id)) @ id), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (push @ one @ sh)=(id), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(sub @ X1 @ id)=(X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X14:subst > term > subst > $o, X2:term]:(X14 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id|X14 @ id @ (esk2_1 @ X14 @ id @ X2) @ id|~X14 @ id @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ (esk3_2 @ X14 @ X1) @ id)) @ id|~X14 @ id @ X2 @ id), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X12:subst > term > term]:(epred1_0 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (esk1_3 @ X12)) @ id|~epred1_0 @ id @ (X12 @ id @ (esk7_1 @ X12)) @ id|(sub @ (X12 @ (esk4_1 @ X12) @ (esk5_1 @ X12)) @ (esk6_1 @ X12))!=(X12 @ (comp @ (esk4_1 @ X12) @ (esk6_1 @ X12)) @ (sub @ (esk5_1 @ X12) @ (esk6_1 @ X12)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X3:subst, X12:subst > term > term]:(hoaslam @ X3 @ X12)=(lam @ (X12 @ sh @ one)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X12:subst > term > term, X3:subst, X1:term]:(esk1_3 @ X12 @ X3 @ X1)=(X12 @ X3 @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X14:subst > term > subst > $o, X2:term]:(X14 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ X14 @ X1) @ id|X14 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id|X14 @ id @ (esk2_1 @ X14 @ id @ X2) @ id|~X14 @ id @ X2 @ id), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X12:subst > term > term]:(epred1_0 @ id @ (esk7_1 @ X12) @ id|epred1_0 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (esk1_3 @ X12)) @ id|(sub @ (X12 @ (esk4_1 @ X12) @ (esk5_1 @ X12)) @ (esk6_1 @ X12))!=(X12 @ (comp @ (esk4_1 @ X12) @ (esk6_1 @ X12)) @ (sub @ (esk5_1 @ X12) @ (esk6_1 @ X12)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X14:subst > term > subst > $o]:(X14 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ X14 @ X1) @ id|X14 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id|~X14 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (esk1_3 @ (esk2_1 @ X14))) @ id), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X3:subst, X14:subst > term > subst > $o, X4:subst, X2:term]:((esk2_1 @ X14 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))=(sub @ (esk2_1 @ X14 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4)|X14 @ id @ (lam @ X2) @ id|~X14 @ id @ (sub @ X2 @ (push @ (esk3_2 @ X14 @ X2) @ id)) @ id), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(epred1_0 @ id @ (sub @ esk8_0 @ (push @ X1 @ id)) @ id|~epred1_0 @ id @ X1 @ id), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ~epred1_0 @ id @ (lam @ esk8_0) @ id, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X14:subst > term > subst > $o, X2:term, X1:term]:(X14 @ id @ (esk2_1 @ X14 @ id @ X1) @ id|X14 @ id @ (lam @ X2) @ id|~X14 @ id @ (sub @ X2 @ (push @ (esk3_2 @ X14 @ X2) @ id)) @ id|~X14 @ id @ X1 @ id), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_15]), c_0_16])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ![X12:subst > term > term]:(epred1_0 @ id @ (lam @ (X12 @ sh @ one)) @ id|(X12 @ (comp @ (esk4_1 @ X12) @ (esk6_1 @ X12)) @ (sub @ (esk5_1 @ X12) @ (esk6_1 @ X12)))!=(sub @ (X12 @ (esk4_1 @ X12) @ (esk5_1 @ X12)) @ (esk6_1 @ X12))|~epred1_0 @ id @ (X12 @ id @ (esk7_1 @ X12)) @ id), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19]), c_0_20])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X14:subst > term > subst > $o, X2:term, X1:term]:(X14 @ id @ (esk2_1 @ X14 @ id @ X1) @ id|X14 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ X14 @ X2) @ id|X14 @ id @ (lam @ X2) @ id|~X14 @ id @ X1 @ id), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_15]), c_0_16])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ![X12:subst > term > term]:(epred1_0 @ id @ (lam @ (X12 @ sh @ one)) @ id|epred1_0 @ id @ (esk7_1 @ X12) @ id|(X12 @ (comp @ (esk4_1 @ X12) @ (esk6_1 @ X12)) @ (sub @ (esk5_1 @ X12) @ (esk6_1 @ X12)))!=(sub @ (X12 @ (esk4_1 @ X12) @ (esk5_1 @ X12)) @ (esk6_1 @ X12))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_19]), c_0_20])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X14:subst > term > subst > $o]:(X14 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ X14 @ X1) @ id|X14 @ id @ (lam @ X1) @ id|~X14 @ id @ (lam @ (esk2_1 @ X14 @ sh @ one)) @ id), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_15]), c_0_16]), c_0_19]), c_0_20])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X3:subst, X4:subst]:((esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))=(sub @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4)|~epred1_0 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ epred1_0 @ esk8_0) @ id), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25]), c_0_26])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X14:subst > term > subst > $o]:(X14 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id|~X14 @ id @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ (esk3_2 @ X14 @ X1) @ id)) @ id|~X14 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (esk1_3 @ (esk2_1 @ X14))) @ id), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(epred1_0 @ id @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ id @ X1) @ id|~epred1_0 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ epred1_0 @ esk8_0) @ id|~epred1_0 @ id @ X1 @ id), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_25]), c_0_26])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(epred1_0 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ epred1_0 @ X1) @ id|epred1_0 @ id @ (lam @ X1) @ id|(esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ (comp @ (esk4_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0)) @ (esk6_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0))) @ (sub @ (esk5_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0)) @ (esk6_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0))))!=(sub @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ (esk4_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0)) @ (esk5_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0))) @ (esk6_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_29]), c_0_30]), c_0_31])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X4:subst, X3:subst, X2:term]:((esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))=(sub @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4)|epred1_0 @ id @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ id @ X2) @ id|~epred1_0 @ id @ X2 @ id), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_29]), c_0_26])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X14:subst > term > subst > $o]:(X14 @ id @ (lam @ X1) @ id|~X14 @ id @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ (esk3_2 @ X14 @ X1) @ id)) @ id|~X14 @ id @ (lam @ (esk2_1 @ X14 @ sh @ one)) @ id), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_15]), c_0_16]), c_0_19]), c_0_20])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(epred1_0 @ id @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ id @ X1) @ id|~epred1_0 @ id @ X1 @ id), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34, c_0_35]), c_0_26]), c_0_36])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, (~epred1_0 @ id @ (lam @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ sh @ one)) @ id|~epred1_0 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ epred1_0 @ esk8_0) @ id), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_25]), c_0_26])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ id @ (lam @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ sh @ one)) @ id|(esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ (comp @ (esk4_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0)) @ (esk6_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0))) @ (sub @ (esk5_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0)) @ (esk6_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0))))!=(sub @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ (esk4_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0)) @ (esk5_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0))) @ (esk6_1 @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_38]), c_0_30])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X2:term, X3:subst, X14:subst > term > subst > $o, X4:subst]:(X14 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ X14 @ X1) @ id|X14 @ id @ (lam @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ id|(sub @ (esk2_1 @ X14 @ X3 @ X2) @ X4)=(esk2_1 @ X14 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X2 @ X4))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, ~epred1_0 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ epred1_0 @ esk8_0) @ id, inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_40]), c_0_32])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X3:subst, X14:subst > term > subst > $o, X4:subst, X2:term]:((esk2_1 @ X14 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))=(sub @ (esk2_1 @ X14 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4)|X14 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ X14 @ X2) @ id|X14 @ id @ (lam @ X2) @ id), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41, c_0_15]), c_0_16])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X3:subst, X4:subst]:(esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))=(sub @ (esk2_1 @ epred1_0 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42, c_0_43]), c_0_26])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_45, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(epred1_0 @ id @ (esk3_2 @ epred1_0 @ X1) @ id|epred1_0 @ id @ (lam @ X1) @ id), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_44])])).
0.23/0.43	thf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42, c_0_45]), c_0_26]), ['proof']).
0.23/0.43	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.23/0.43	# Proof object total steps             : 47
0.23/0.43	# Proof object clause steps            : 33
0.23/0.43	# Proof object formula steps           : 14
0.23/0.43	# Proof object conjectures             : 34
0.23/0.43	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 31
0.23/0.43	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
0.23/0.43	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 14
0.23/0.43	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
0.23/0.43	# Proof object generating inferences   : 10
0.23/0.43	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 34
0.23/0.43	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
0.23/0.43	# Parsed axioms                        : 238
0.23/0.43	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.23/0.43	# Initial clauses                      : 141
0.23/0.43	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 124
0.23/0.43	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 17
0.23/0.43	# Processed clauses                    : 90
0.23/0.43	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.23/0.43	# ...subsumed                          : 27
0.23/0.43	# ...remaining for further processing  : 62
0.23/0.43	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.23/0.43	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.23/0.43	# Backward-subsumed                    : 4
0.23/0.43	# Backward-rewritten                   : 4
0.23/0.43	# Generated clauses                    : 119
0.23/0.43	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 104
0.23/0.43	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
0.23/0.43	# Paramodulations                      : 95
0.23/0.43	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.23/0.43	# NegExts                              : 0
0.23/0.43	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.23/0.43	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.23/0.43	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.23/0.43	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.23/0.43	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.23/0.43	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.23/0.43	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.23/0.43	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.23/0.43	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.23/0.43	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.23/0.43	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.23/0.43	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.23/0.43	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.23/0.43	# Current number of processed clauses  : 37
0.23/0.43	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 12
0.23/0.43	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
0.23/0.43	#    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.23/0.43	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 17
0.23/0.43	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 45
0.23/0.43	# ...number of literals in the above   : 176
0.23/0.43	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.23/0.43	# Current number of archived clauses   : 25
0.23/0.43	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 71
0.23/0.43	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
0.23/0.43	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11
0.23/0.43	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 116
0.23/0.43	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 102
0.23/0.43	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 63
0.23/0.43	# BW rewrite match successes           : 12
0.23/0.43	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.23/0.43	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.23/0.43	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 19404
0.23/0.43	
0.23/0.43	# -------------------------------------------------
0.23/0.43	# User time                : 0.046 s
0.23/0.43	# System time              : 0.009 s
0.23/0.43	# Total time               : 0.055 s
0.23/0.43	# Maximum resident set size: 2000 pages
0.23/0.43	EOF